A discussion on cultural relativism as a foundation for morality

Happy 50th Anniversary To Us. Marking 50 years of marriage, and ever growing love. Is it any wonder that we now have an Alinskyian American Government?

A discussion on cultural relativism as a foundation for morality

Overview[ edit ] Moral science may refer to the consideration of what is best for, and how to maximize the flourishing of, either particular individuals [2] or all conscious creatures. The dictum can be set aside for a deeper, albeit programmatic, neurobiological perspective on what reasoning and problem-solving are, how social navigation works, how evaluation is accomplished by nervous systems, and how mammalian brains make decisions.

Quine advocated naturalizing epistemology by looking to natural sciences like psychology for a full explanation of knowledge.

Paul Kurtzwho believes that the careful, secular pursuit of normative rules is vital to society, coined the term eupraxophy to refer to his approach to normative ethics.

Steven PinkerSam Harrisand Peter Singer believe that we learn what is right and wrong through reason and empirical methodology.

Maria Ossowska thought that sociology was inextricably related to philosophical reflections on morality, including normative ethics.

She proposed that science analyze: The Individual, Community, and Future Generations Daleiden's book, in contrast to Harris, extensively discusses the relevant philosophical literature.

A discussion on cultural relativism as a foundation for morality

In The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human ValuesSam Harris 's goal is to show how moral truth can be backed by "science", or more specifically, empirical knowledgecritical thinking, philosophy, but most controversially, the scientific method.

Patricia Churchland offers that, accepting Hume 's is-ought problemthe use of induction from premises and definitions remains a valid way of reasoning in life and science.


The truth seems to be that values rooted in the circuitry for caring—for well-being of self, offspring, mates, kin, and others—shape social reasoning about many issues: One should therefore expect that moral prescriptions will change as humans gain understanding.

Moral psychology Training to promote good behaviour[ edit ] The science of morality may aim to discover the best ways to motivate and shape individuals.

Methods to accomplish this include instilling explicit virtuesbuilding character strengthsand forming mental associations. These generally require some level of practical reason. James Rest suggested that abstract reasoning is also a factor in making moral judgements [16] and emphasized that moral judgements alone do not predict moral behaviour: They also effectively use art and myths to educate people about moral situations.

Instead, Harris imagines data about normative moral issues being shared in the same way as other sciences e. He says "centralization of power irrevocably in the hands of one person or an elite has always ultimately led to great evil for the human race.

It was the novel experiment of democracy—a clear break with tradition—that ended the long tradition of tyranny. In other words, there are a great many moral norms that should never be the task of the government to enforce.

Differential reinforcement and Prison One author has argued that to attain a society where people are motivated by conditioned self-interest, punishment must go hand-in-hand with reward.

This is so, even if libertarian free will is false.

A discussion on cultural relativism as a foundation for morality

This is because punishment can still serve its purposes: This author argues that, at least, any prison system should be pursuing those goals, and that it is an empirical question as to what sorts of punishment realize these goals most effectively, and how well various prison systems actually serve these purposes.

Positive psychology and Moral development The brain areas that are consistently involved when humans reason about moral issues have been investigated. These results provide evidence that the neural network underlying moral decisions is probably domain-global i.

An essential, shared component of moral judgment involves the capacity to detect morally salient content within a given social context. Recent research implicated the salience network in this initial detection of moral content.

This suggest that moral cognition involves both bottom-up and top-down attentional processes, mediated by discrete large-scale brain networks and their interactions.

Other implications[ edit ] Daleiden provides examples of how science can use empirical evidence to assess the effect that specific behaviors can have on the well-being of individuals and society with regard to various moral issues.

He argues that science supports decriminalization and regulation of drugseuthanasia under some circumstances, and the permission of sexual behaviors that are not tolerated in some cultures he cites homosexuality as an example.

Daleiden further argues that in seeking to reduce human suffering, abortion should not only be permissible, but at times a moral obligation as in the case of a mother of a potential child who would face the probability of much suffering.

Like all moral claims in his book, however, Daleiden is adamant that these decisions remain grounded in, and contingent on empirical evidence.

An action may be necessary and more moral once we are aware of circumstances. Criticisms[ edit ] The idea of a normative science of morality has met with some criticisms.

Critics include physicist Sean M. Carrollwho argues that morality cannot be part of science.

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

In contrast, moral scientists defend the position that such a division between values and scientific facts "moral relativism" is not only arbitrary and illusory, but impeding progress towards taking action against documented cases of human rights violations in different cultures.write at least words discussion.

dont need timberdesignmag.comal relativism is the view that “right” just means “what is right according to a given culture” and “wrong” just means “what is deemed wrong by a given culture.” If so, then “right” and “wrong” are not universal truths and even though action x really is wrong according to culture Y is may be “right.

Virtue ethics is currently one of three major approaches in normative ethics. It may, initially, be identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach that emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism).

Quotables – Culture "The infringement of women's rights is usually exercised in the name of tradition, religion, social cohesion, morality, or some complex of transcendent values. Moral Relativism. Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.

It has often been associated with other claims about morality: notably, the thesis that different cultures often exhibit radically different moral. Cultural Relativism is the view that moral or ethical systems, which vary from culture to culture, are all equally valid and no one system is really “better” than any other.

This is based on the idea that there is no ultimate standard of good or evil, so every judgment about right and wrong is a. Relativism and Ethics: What is Truth - does it matter?

Kenneth Cauthen. ABSTRACT: Ethical beliefs have strong implications for how we timberdesignmag.coms about these beliefs have no necessary or inevitable consequences for what we believe to be right and good or for what we do in practice.

Cultural Relativism