In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: The result of the procedure would be a human being in its own right. Given the current level of cloning technology concerning other animals there is every reason to believe that early human clones will have shorter-than-average life-spans, and will be unusually prone to disease. In addition, they would be unusually at risk of genetic defects, though they would still, probably, have lives worth living.
A child produced by cloning would be the genetic duplicate of an existing person. If you cloned yourself, the resulting child would be neither your son or daughter nor your twin brother or sister, but a new category of human being: The great majority of people have an intuitive sense that human beings should not be cloned.
Arguments offered for and against reproductive cloning are given below. A summary comment follows at the end of the arguments. Arguments Against Reproductive Cloning 1. Reproductive cloning would foster an understanding of children, and of people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to possess specific characteristics.
Reproductive cloning would diminish the sense of uniqueness of an individual.
|Reproductive Cloning Arguments Pro and Con | Center for Genetics and Society||The arguments against human cloning, such as those presented in the Andrews Report, are weak, except for the safety issue.|
It would violate deeply and widely held convictions concerning human individuality and freedom, and could lead to a devaluation of clones in comparison with non-clones. Cloned children would unavoidably be raised "in the shadow" of their nuclear donor, in a way that would strongly tend to constrain individual psychological and social development.
Reproductive cloning is inherently unsafe. The technique could not be developed in humans without putting the physical safety of the clones and the women who bear them at grave risk. If reproductive cloning is permitted to happen and becomes accepted, it is difficult to see how any other dangerous applications of genetic engineering technology could be proscribed.
Rebuttals to Arguments Against Reproductive Cloning 1 and 2. This will be true only if we allow it to be true.
There is no reason that individuals and society can't learn to embrace human clones as just one more element of human diversity and creativity. The problem of "expectations" is hardly unique to cloned children. Most parents learn to communicate their expectations about their children in a moderate and ultimately positive way.
Every medical technology carries with it a degree of risk. Cloning techniques will eventually be perfected in mammals and will then be suitable for human trials.
Human society can accept or reject any proposed technology on its own merits. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1. Reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children for people who cannot be helped by other fertility treatments i.
Reproductive cloning would allow lesbians to have a child without having to use donor sperm, and gay men to have a child that does not have genes derived from an egg donor though, of course, a surrogate would have to carry the pregnancy.
Reproductive cloning could allow parents of a child who has died to seek redress for their loss. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction. Rebuttals to Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1.The identity argument is not an argument against cloning; rather it is an argument against placing unnecessary and unwarranted pressure on an individual, regardless of how they were conceived.
Cloning is a threat to human diversity. It is only composed of arguments in favor of human cloning. It gives a list of positive aspects -in their point of view- which are a little bit explain.
So here I’m going to . 3. Reproductive cloning could allow parents of a child who has died to seek redress for their loss.
4. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction. Rebuttals to Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning.
1. the arguments in support of permitting human cloning, although with no implication that it is the stronger or weaker position.
Moral Arguments in Support of Human Cloning. Jul 15, · Cloning animals has lead to a huge discussion on science, religion and the role of tehcnology in our everyday lives. I will be posting two articles, this one dedicated to providing 6 strong arguments in the favor of cloning and another which provides 6 arguments against timberdesignmag.coms: Jul 15, · Cloning animals has lead to a huge discussion on science, religion and the role of tehcnology in our everyday lives.
I will be posting two articles, this one dedicated to providing 6 strong arguments in the favor of cloning and another which provides 6 arguments against timberdesignmag.coms: