Analysis of j l mackie s evil and omnipotence

Philosophers are passionately ready to debate about the topic of the existence of God, as this is one of the philosophical topics of discussion that has remained timeless, in that it has not become obsolete. Those arguing for the existence of God have not been able to provide enough evidence to persuade everyone who argued against the existence of God. The converse is also true. Mackie, in his essay Evil and Omnipotencetries to prove that believing in a mighty and all good god is irrational.

Analysis of j l mackie s evil and omnipotence

Mackie's, Evil And Omnipotence is available for you on Essays Mackie's, Evil and Omnipotence The question of the existence of God has been brought up endlessly time and time again throughout the history of the world.

Countless discussions take place daily by people of all religious beliefs in regards to the existence of a God and if a God did exist, then why is there so much evil in the world we live in.

Mackie in his argument from "Evil and Omnipotence", brings forth the discussion problem that 1 God is omnipotent; 2 God is wholly good; 3 Yet evil exists Mackie. Mackie states that an omnipotent god would not allow evil to exist because an omnipotent god would ensure that evil was eliminated, and since an omnipotent god has no limits on their powers evil could not exist, PERIOD.

His view is that these three propositions cannot exist together without one of them having to be false. Mackie claims that the problem of evil is only a problem for those who believe in the existence of God and that God is omnipotent and wholly good.

He states that theologian beliefs and doctrines are inconsistent with each other and that all they do is lead to further unanswerable questions that have no logical solutions regarding the existence of God and why evil is so prevalent in our world.

Analysis of j l mackie s evil and omnipotence

This paper attempts to breakdown Mackie's argument in regards to his view of the three propositions, then comes to this writer's conclusion that God is not infinitely powerful and that evil can exist in our world and that God does not have control over it.

Mackie has laid some ground rules to establish his assumptions from. These are "good is opposed to evil", "good always eliminates evil", and "an omnipotent thing has no limits to what it can do.

He attempts to analyze the problem by using two approaches.

EVIL AND OMNIPOTENCE Mackie University of Sydney The traditional arguments for the existence of God have been fairly thoroughly criticised by philosophers. But the theologian can, if he wishes, accept this criticism.

He has classified these approaches as "Adequate Solutions" and "Fallacious Solutions". Adequate Solutions Mackie's approach to Adequate Solutions is based upon giving up on or modifying one of the propositions.

If you limit or modify the meaning of one of the propositions, then the question of evil can be addressed. If you look at omnipotent as not having "all power", but having limited power then you could reason that the limitation of power allows evil to exist.

That being said, what other limitations might exist.

J. L. Mackie - Wikipedia

Those that have this view will imply that even though God's omnipotence may have certain limitations, in other cases it may not. This creates an inconsistent solution. It allows one to overcome the initial objection only to imply or ascertain these beliefs back into the system at a later point.

By the fact that the proposition is only modified on a temporary basis creates the problem to this approach. Fallacious Solutions Fallacious Solutions maintain all of the propositions but imply the rejection of one or more of them during the explanation of the problem of evil Mackie.

Fallacious Solutions have a tendency to play with what is meant by "good" and "evil" or how good and evil are opposed or interact. Mackie lists several examples where fallacious solutions are used to solve the problem of evil, each having its own set of issues.

Several issues exist within this thinking. Mackie points out that by saying that God can't create good without having evil, then this would mean he has a limitation in his power and therefore no longer be able to be viewed as omnipotent or limited in some fashion.J. L. Mackie () Evil & Omnipotence - SUMMARY J.L.

Ex-apologist: Notes on Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence"

Mackie 's essay begins by setting out the Problem of Evil & Suffering. In section A, Mackie outlines the "Adequate Solutions" offered by some religious thinkers. In he published one of his "Evil and Omnipotence", summarizing his view that the simultaneous existence of evil and an all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good God was "positively irrational".

Mackie's () Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J. L. Mackie, Routledge Kegan & Paul. J. L. Mackie, in his essay Evil and Omnipotence, tries to prove that believing in a mighty and all good god is irrational.

His primary point of focus is the existence of evil, which, he claims, goes against the existence of an all good god. Analysis of J.L. Mackie's, Evil and Omnipotence The question of the existence of God has been brought up endlessly time and time again throughout the history of the world.

Countless discussions take place daily by people of all religious beliefs in regards to the existence of a God and if a God did exist, then why is there so much evil in the. Critiques on J. L. Mackie’s “Evil and Omnipotence” The arguments for and against God has prevailed throughout the history of humankind.

Philosophers are passionately ready to debate about the topic of the existence of God, as this is one of the philosophical topics of discussion that has remained timeless, in that it has not become obsolete. Analysis of J.L. Mackie's, Evil and Omnipotence The question of the existence of God has been brought up endlessly time and time again throughout the history of the world.

Countless discussions take place daily by people of all religious beliefs in regards to the existence of a God and if a God did exist, then why is there so much evil in the.

Evil and Omnipotence