Politics and the… The thesis of this essay can be divided into two portions which co-exist throughout the essay and are frequently used to support each other. In the introduction of the essay Mr.
Even at first glance of the five passages he chose to dissect and reprimand, I could not detect major flaws other than a lack of clarity in some cases. With further thought, however, I began to see validity in his arguments. Orwell suggests that modern-day writers are lacking in innovation and motivation.
He argues that writers may subconsciously use idioms in order to save mental energy while sacrificing their clarity, resulting in vague expressions.
These points made me stop and reflect upon the kinds of unclear expressions I have picked up from reading the works of others. Orwell thus urges us to create own original thoughts. His points about the importance of using euphemism in political writing are equally fascinating.
This can be seen when politicians blend foreign phrases together during speeches to hide the meaning of what they are actually saying.
For example, I use the passive voice where I should use the active voice, I use foreign phrases instead of using an everyday English equivalent, and I avoid cutting out words when I should cut them out. Not only did his guidelines help me realize that I could vastly improve the clarity of my writing, but he addresses a greater point in saying that the writers society has gotten lazy as a whole.
He makes a crucial point when he says writers need to be focused in on their writing, so to avoid the mistakes that they have become accustomed to making. You have to choose between tone, sophistication of vocabulary, and, as Orwell points out, the preciseness of language. Language is constantly evolving and Orwell takes a look at how the English language is inherently imprecise and ugly because of how many people use it.
He points out a number of misused phrases and despite this essay being over sixty years old, I was surprised by how many I still see in both my own writing and what I encounter on day to day reading. When met with word counts and page requirements it is easy to add extraneous adjectives that contribute nothing more than another word to the word count.
Not only do these adjectives fail to add anything substantial to your writing but they also detract from the concise and beauty of your written words. Too often unnecessary words are added, idioms are misused or over generic words are utilised, and they all lead up to a complete vagueness in writing of the modern era.
What does heavenly mean?
Is the bacon juicy, crispy, or greasy? Ironically, Orwell himself made the mistake in his writing as well, like using jargons and metaphor in the opening paragraph that he later slaps himself in the face by attacking the usage.
Perhaps an aspect that Orwell has failed to see is each era has its usage of language, and politics since the last century may have given rise to the vague and euphemistic but meaningless language today.
However, the purpose of the new language might serve to avoid provocative comments or controversial issues. I can only acknowledge the obvious gap, but not with the power to criticize.
Yet, as I continued reading, more and more of his criticism rang true; I saw many of the flaws he described in my own writing. We simply do not take the time and effort to truly think about how we construct our sentences and the impact of each word in it.Politics and the English Language Answers In Orwell’s essay Politics and the English Language, Orwell expresses his raw opinion on the deterioration of the English language and how politics is a cause for the “vagueness and incompetence” that writing has succumbed too.
Politics and the English Language" (), by George Orwell, is an essay criticizing "ugly and inaccurate" contemporary written English. He asserted contemporary English prose causes and affects foolish thoughts and dishonest politics.
I found George Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language” to be quite intriguing. At first glance, Orwell’s piece seemed to be a scathing review of all aspects of Modern English.
By critiquing other’s writing, I assumed Orwell to be a conceited writer who held everyone else’s writing to his own standards.
|George Orwell: Politics and the English Language||It is one of his most famous essays written about the decay of language and use of political language to conceal political sins. It raises concerns regarding the spreading decay of language whose roots lie somewhere in politics.|
Oct 24, · In George Orwell’s Politics and the English Language, he expresses his opinion on the digression of the English timberdesignmag.com articulates in a negative manner, that modern English is ‘full of bad habits’ (Orwell, ) and in today’s society, people are using the English Language imprecisely.
George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language,” begins by refuting common presumptions that hold that the decline of the English language is a reflection of the state of society and politics, that this degeneration is inevitable, and that it’s hopeless to . The Intro of the essay asserts the notion that the English language has been disfigured by the human race and is on the residual decline as a resultant.
Mr. Orwell attributes this downfall to politics and economic causes but goes on to outline his remedy to correct what he refers to as a “reversible” process.